Crucial M4 vs OCZ Vertex 3: New Firmware Face-Off

Written by Harry Butler

September 8, 2011 | 07:57

Tags: #crucial-m4 #o #vertex-3

Companies: #bit-tech #crucial #ocz

Crucial vs OCZ: ATTO - Compressible Read and Write

Website: ATTO Disk Benchmark

Following the introduction of Window 7's improved caching technology, our traditional sequential read/write benchmark, FC -Test, was no longer practical to use, due to data being immediately cached and thus invalidating our copy and read performance figures.

Instead, we've opted for ATTO disk benchmark as a straightforward tool for testing a hard disk or SSD's ability to read and write files of various sizes. The benchmark sequentially writes and reads files varying in size from 0.5KB to 8MB, and can also be adjusted for overlapped I/O and a variety of queue depths. We've tested using the benchmark's default settings, recording 1,024KB file performance.

ATTO's 256MB benchmark uses extremely compressible data, enabling drives that use compression-based storage, such as those based on SandForce's drive controllers, to achieve their absolute maximum performance. However, this rarely translates into real world performance, as the majority of today's data is at least partially compressed.

Sequential Performance


ATTO Disk Benchmark

4KB Compressible Sequential Read Speed

  • Crucial M4 256GB (Marvell) v0009
  • OCZ Vertex 3 240GB (SandForce 2281) v2.11
  • Crucial C300 256GB (Marvell)
  • Crucial M4 256GB (Marvell) v0002
  • Patriot Wildfire 120GB (SandForce 2281)
  • OCZ Vertex 3 240GB (SandForce 2281) v2.02
  • Intel 510 120GB (Marvell)
  • OCZ Vertex 2 100GB (SandForce)
    • 286
    • 240
    • 194
    • 169
    • 166
    • 159
    • 149
    • 133
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
MB/sec, Higher Is Better
  • Average Read Speed

ATTO Disk Benchmark

4KB Compressible Sequential Write Speed

  • OCZ Vertex 3 240GB (SandForce 2281) v2.11
  • OCZ Vertex 2 100GB (SandForce)
  • Crucial M4 256GB (Marvell) v0009
  • Crucial M4 256GB (Marvell) v0002
  • OCZ Vertex 3 240GB (SandForce 2281) v2.02
  • Crucial C300 256GB (Marvell)
  • Intel 510 120GB (Marvell)
    • 280
    • 268
    • 234
    • 230
    • 223
    • 188
    • 127
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
MB/sec, Higher Is Better
  • Average Read Speed

ATTO Disk Benchmark

1,024KB Compressible Sequential Read Speed

  • OCZ Vertex 3 240GB (SandForce 2281) v2.02
  • OCZ Vertex 3 240GB (SandForce 2281) v2.11
  • Crucial M4 256GB (Marvell) v0009
  • Crucial M4 256GB (Marvell) v0002
  • Intel 510 120GB (Marvell)
  • Crucial C300 256GB (Marvell)
  • G.SKill Phoenix 100GB (SandForce 1222)
  • Intel X-25M 160GB
  • OCZ Vertex 120GB (Indilinx Barefoot)
    • 547
    • 543
    • 526
    • 430
    • 424
    • 368
    • 265
    • 265
    • 258
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
MB/sec, Higher Is Better
  • Average Random Read

ATTO Disk Benchmark

1,024KB Compressible Sequential Write Speed

  • OCZ Vertex 3 240GB (SandForce 2281) v2.11
  • OCZ Vertex 3 240GB (SandForce 2281) v2.02
  • Crucial M4 256GB (Marvell) v0002
  • Crucial M4 256GB (Marvell) v0009
  • G.SKill Phoenix 100GB (SandForce 1222)
  • Crucial C300 256GB (Marvell)
  • Intel 510 120GB (Marvell)
  • OCZ Vertex 120GB (Indilinx Barefoot)
  • Intel X-25M 160GB
    • 513
    • 511
    • 284
    • 274
    • 266
    • 233
    • 206
    • 197
    • 105
0
100
200
300
400
500
MB/sec, Higher Is Better
  • Average Sequential Write

Read our performance analysis.
Discuss this in the forums

Posted by Parge - Thu Sep 08 2011 07:35

Boom! Game set and match! Great article guys, I was interested to hear about this since you talked about it on the podcast.

Posted by andrew8200m - Thu Sep 08 2011 07:41

After all the issues with sandforce and BSODs on the dodgy ill completed firmwares I chucked my v3 out and managed to buy a pair of M4s without spending too much more. I've not seen any performance drop at all moving to drives using 0002 and with an update to 0009 they are much faster in the system than the V3. No hangs, no BSODs, no watching performance drop as I fill the drive either.

All that's required now if for the elmcrest to drop in price and the sandforce 2281 drives using the synchronous NAND will be no longer in the running due to price.

The sandforce drives using the cheap asynchronous NAND such as the agility 3, Solid 3 and Force 3 60gb 120gb units (£60-80 and £125-140 price point) will need to drop in price now as the M4 64gb can be picked up for £73 whilst the 128gb is around £135.

If you want a Vertex 3 at 60gb or 120gb your paying £110 and £175 based on each drive which is pretty poor in comparison.

Posted by Ph4ZeD - Thu Sep 08 2011 07:42

Great article guys!

Posted by runadumb - Thu Sep 08 2011 07:42

I really must update my vertex 3's firmware. Its kinda annoying how you praise the update software only to then say you can't use this method on a boot drive. Seeing as that's how everyone in the entire world bar none uses their SSD.
Not fussed on the speed increase I just want the BSOD to stop.
null
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04

In line with recent changes to data protection legislation in the UK and Europe we would like to direct you to our updated Privacy Policy here.