Crucial vs OCZ: ATTO - Compressible Read and Write
Website: ATTO Disk Benchmark
Following the introduction of Window 7's improved caching technology, our traditional sequential read/write benchmark, FC -Test, was no longer practical to use, due to data being immediately cached and thus invalidating our copy and read performance figures.
Instead, we've opted for ATTO disk benchmark as a straightforward tool for testing a hard disk or SSD's ability to read and write files of various sizes. The benchmark sequentially writes and reads files varying in size from 0.5KB to 8MB, and can also be adjusted for overlapped I/O and a variety of queue depths. We've tested using the benchmark's default settings, recording 1,024KB file performance.
ATTO's 256MB benchmark uses extremely compressible data, enabling drives that use compression-based storage, such as those based on SandForce's drive controllers, to achieve their absolute maximum performance. However, this rarely translates into real world performance, as the majority of today's data is at least partially compressed.
Sequential Performance
-
Crucial M4 256GB (Marvell) v0009
-
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB (SandForce 2281) v2.11
-
Crucial C300 256GB (Marvell)
-
Crucial M4 256GB (Marvell) v0002
-
Patriot Wildfire 120GB (SandForce 2281)
-
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB (SandForce 2281) v2.02
-
Intel 510 120GB (Marvell)
-
OCZ Vertex 2 100GB (SandForce)
MB/sec, Higher Is Better
-
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB (SandForce 2281) v2.11
-
OCZ Vertex 2 100GB (SandForce)
-
Crucial M4 256GB (Marvell) v0009
-
Crucial M4 256GB (Marvell) v0002
-
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB (SandForce 2281) v2.02
-
Crucial C300 256GB (Marvell)
-
Intel 510 120GB (Marvell)
MB/sec, Higher Is Better
-
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB (SandForce 2281) v2.02
-
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB (SandForce 2281) v2.11
-
Crucial M4 256GB (Marvell) v0009
-
Crucial M4 256GB (Marvell) v0002
-
Intel 510 120GB (Marvell)
-
Crucial C300 256GB (Marvell)
-
G.SKill Phoenix 100GB (SandForce 1222)
-
Intel X-25M 160GB
-
OCZ Vertex 120GB (Indilinx Barefoot)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
MB/sec, Higher Is Better
-
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB (SandForce 2281) v2.11
-
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB (SandForce 2281) v2.02
-
Crucial M4 256GB (Marvell) v0002
-
Crucial M4 256GB (Marvell) v0009
-
G.SKill Phoenix 100GB (SandForce 1222)
-
Crucial C300 256GB (Marvell)
-
Intel 510 120GB (Marvell)
-
OCZ Vertex 120GB (Indilinx Barefoot)
-
Intel X-25M 160GB
MB/sec, Higher Is Better
Read our
performance analysis.
Want to comment? Please log in.
Posted by Parge - Thu Sep 08 2011 07:35
Posted by andrew8200m - Thu Sep 08 2011 07:41
All that's required now if for the elmcrest to drop in price and the sandforce 2281 drives using the synchronous NAND will be no longer in the running due to price.
The sandforce drives using the cheap asynchronous NAND such as the agility 3, Solid 3 and Force 3 60gb 120gb units (£60-80 and £125-140 price point) will need to drop in price now as the M4 64gb can be picked up for £73 whilst the 128gb is around £135.
If you want a Vertex 3 at 60gb or 120gb your paying £110 and £175 based on each drive which is pretty poor in comparison.
Posted by Ph4ZeD - Thu Sep 08 2011 07:42
Posted by runadumb - Thu Sep 08 2011 07:42
Not fussed on the speed increase I just want the BSOD to stop.